Public Decision-Making Process

Watch the webinar segment

Better decisions come from better structure—not louder debate. The session opened with a practical reset: public decision-making works best when it’s treated as a repeatable process, not a personality contest.

The core move is breaking big, politicized questions into smaller ones that are easier to answer cleanly and publicly. Create clarity before solutions, tradeoffs, or votes.

Overview of the Public Meeting Assistant

Watch the webinar segment

A meeting-specific notebook that reduces chaos before and after the dais. We introduced the Public Meeting Assistant, co-created with FlashVote, as a purpose-built module designed to support staff and meeting workflows with meeting-specific context—not generic chat.

Think one “notebook” per meeting, with pre-meeting and post-meeting materials built around the official record. The intent is simple: align staff and officials on the same baseline so the meeting runs cleaner and the follow-up is faster.

Pre-Meeting Agents

Watch the webinar segment

Everyone walks in prepared—because the packet gets translated into decision-ready signals. Pre-meeting agents pull from the agenda management system—official agenda plus attachments—and convert the packet into usable preparation.

The output is a cheat sheet: highlights, items of consequence, and quick context so officials aren’t cold-starting at the dais. That matters because preparation reduces repeat questions, sidetracks, and last-minute surprises.

Post-Meeting Agents

Watch the webinar segment

Turn hours of follow-up into a fast, usable review built from the transcript. Post-meeting outputs are then cleaned for accuracy so staff aren’t fighting misspellings, acronyms, and noise. Agents generate what people actually need right after the meeting: voting summaries, meeting detail, internal recap formats, citizen-facing highlights, and follow-up tasks.

The guardrail stays firm: AI helps draft, but humans approve—especially where “minutes” are a legal term.

Fact Checking Agents

Watch the webinar segment

Replay and search meeting conversations fast—so “Did I say that?” becomes answerable. We highlighted fact checking as a practical tool for high-scrutiny environments, especially when staff are asked to verify what was discussed, decided, or claimed across meetings. Instead of rewatching hours of video, you can search and pull the relevant passages quickly, then validate with a human in the loop. This is where institutional memory stops living only in a few people’s heads.

Get cited answers in seconds—because trust requires receipts. The session closed on what really builds confidence with residents and stakeholders: defensible answers grounded in the source record. When pressure hits, speed helps, but citations are what protect credibility. The point isn’t just finding an answer—it’s producing the receipts that show how the decision was made and why it holds up.